Skip to main content
↑ Back to the start
6 months 2 weeks ago
Compared with Socrates and Bruno, with the great martyrs of Russia, with the Chicago Anarchists, Francisco Ferrer, and unnumbered others, Christ cuts a poor figure indeed.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Emma Goldman [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/emma-goldman-the-failure-of-christianity "The Failure of Christianity"] (1913)
6 months 2 weeks ago
Neither one nor the other doth follow, for that both the assertions may be true. The Oracle adjudged Socrates the wi­sest of all men, whose knowledg is limited; Socrates acknowledgeth that he knew nothing in relation to absolute wisdome, which is infinite; and because of infinite, much is the same part as is little, and as is nothing (for to arrive... to the infinite number, it is all one to accumulate thousands, tens, or ciphers,) therefore Socrates well perceived his wisdom to be nothing, in comparison of the infinite knowledg which he wanted. But yet, because there is some knowledg found amongst men, and this not equally shared to all, Socrates might have a greater share thereof than others, and therefore verified the answer of the Oracle.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Galileo Galilei, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632) as quoted in the Salusbury translation, The Systeme of the World: in Four Dialogues (1661) p. 85
6 months 2 weeks ago
Socrates it was who truly built piecemeal that theorical man. He did it by his doctrine which was singularly deep in the sense that it went straight out to the end of the initial thought, but his radically false doctrine was that morality is in proportion to knowledge, that the man that does not do good is a man that does not know the good and that the man that knows the good does assuredly do it. Here it is precisely, the theorical man introduced as king of the world! Now nothing is more false than this notion. The opposite is more likely to be true. The man that knows the good does not do it, because he is satisfied with knowing it and that is enough for his conceit and because, knowing the good and knowing that he knows it, he fancies that he is doing it and that he has accomplished and fulfilled his duty. The good is instinctive and passionate; the good is in the action and the action is, we must admit, rarely inspired by the idea and by knowledge. It is frequently, one must admit, the effect of an instinctive and unconscious movement.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Emile Faguet, On Reading Nietzsche p. 75
6 months 2 weeks ago
Seemeth it nothing to you, never to accuse, never to blame either God or Man? to wear ever the same countenance in going forth as in coming in? This was the secret of Socrates: yet he never said that he knew or taught anything... Who amongst you makes this his aim? Were it indeed so, you would gladly endure sickness, hunger, aye, death itself.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Epictetus, Golden Sayings of Epictetus #85
6 months 2 weeks ago
As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
See All I know is that I know nothing on Wikipedia for a detailed account of the origins of this attribution. | μοι νυνὶ γέγονεν ἐκ τοῦ διαλόγου μηδὲν εἰδέναι· ὁπότε γὰρ τὸ δίκαιον μὴ οἶδα ὅ ἐστιν, σχολῇ εἴσομαι εἴτε ἀρετή τις οὖσα τυγχάνει εἴτε καὶ οὔ, κ
6 months 2 weeks ago
Exercise till the mind feels delight in reposing from the fatigue.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
First appearance on google books is C. Edwards Lester's 1845 English translation of Ansaldo Ceba's book Il Cittadino di Repubblica, translated as The Citizen of a Republic, which on [https://books.google.com/books?id=82rDFVelj_oC&pg=PA92#v=onepage&q&f=fal
6 months 2 weeks ago
By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy; if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Origin unknown. Attributed to Sydney Smith in Speaker's Handbook of Epigrams and Witticisms (1955) by Herbert Prochnow, p. 190. Variant reported in Why Are You Single? (1949) by Hilda Holland, p. 49: «When asked by a young man whether to marry, Socrates i
6 months 2 weeks ago
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Does not appear attributed to Socrates in any known ancient writings. Earliest source found on google books is [https://books.google.com/books?id=6pKfDwAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&lpg=PA123&dq=%22When%20the%20debate%20is%20lost%2C%20slander%20becomes%2
6 months 2 weeks ago
True wisdom comes to each of us when we realize how little we understand about life, ourselves, and the world around us.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Sometimes presented as a direct quote, this was actually Manuel J. Smith's own general description of Socrates' teachings in his 1974 book When I Say No, I Feel Guilty, on [https://books.google.com/books?id=HHmKDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 65 o
6 months 2 weeks ago
The really important thing is not to live, but to live well. And to live well meant, along with more enjoyable things in life, to live according to your principles.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Presented as a full Socrates quote by various sources like [https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/106034-the-really-important-thing-is-not-to-live-but-to this page], the first sentence of the quote is indeed attributed to Socrates in Plato's dialogue The Apolo

CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia