Skip to main content
6 months 2 weeks ago
And the Science of them, is the true and onely Moral Philosophy. For Moral Philosophy is nothing else but the Science of what is Good, and Evill, in the conversation, and Society of mankind. Good, and Evill, are names that signify our Appetites, and Aversions; which in different tempers, customes, and doctrines of men, are different:
0
⚖0
▼ Source
The First Part, Chapter 15, p. 79
6 months 2 weeks ago
And yet I will venture to believe that in no time, since the beginnings of Society, was the lot of those same dumb millions of toilers so entirely unbearable as it is even in the days now passing over us. It is not to die, or even to die of hunger, that makes a man wretched; many men have died; all men must die,—the last exit of us all is in a Fire-Chariot of Pain. But it is to live miserable we know not why; to work sore and yet gain nothing; to be heart-worn, weary, yet isolated, unrelated, girt in with a cold universal Laissez-faire: it is to die slowly all our life long, imprisoned in a deaf, dead, Infinite Injustice, as in the accursed iron belly of a Phalaris' Bull! This is and remains forever intolerable to all men whom God has made. Do we wonder at French Revolutions, Chartisms, Revolts of Three Days? The times, if we will consider them, are really unexampled.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
Of all things the worst to teach the young is dalliance, for it is this that is the parent of those pleasures from which wickedness springs.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
When Bernard Marx tells the Savage he will try to secure permission for him and his mother to visit the Other Place, John is initially pleased and excited. Echoing Miranda in The Tempest, he exclaims: "O brave new world that has such people in it." Heavy irony. Like innocent Miranda, he is eager to embrace a way of life he neither knows nor understands. And of course he comes unstuck. Yet if we swallow such fancy literary conceits, then ultimately the joke is on us. It is only funny in the sense there are "jokes" about Auschwitz. For it is Huxley who neither knows nor understands the glory of what lies ahead. A utopian society in which we are sublimely happy will be far better than we can presently imagine, not worse. And it is we, trapped in the emotional squalor of late-Darwinian antiquity, who neither know nor understand the lives of the god-like super-beings we are destined to become.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
"[https://www.huxley.net/ Brave New World? A Defence of Paradise-Engineering]", BLTC Research, 1998
6 months 2 weeks ago

If you looked at the political spectrum in Poland at that time, the Communist party promised the best solution. Its political programme was the most fitting for the issues which Poland faced. And I was completely dedicated. Communist ideas were just a continuation of the Enlightenment.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
In the effort to regain a space of true leisure, to bring about a fundamentally correct attitude and "exercise" of leisure, the real difficulty of this so-often despaired-of project consists in the fact that the ultimate root of leisure lies outside the range of our responsible, voluntary action. The fullest harmony with the world, to be precise, cannot come about on the basis of a voluntary decision. Above all, one cannot simply "make" it happen for some ulterior purpose. There are certain things which one cannot do "in order to ..." do something else.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
p. 58
6 months 2 weeks ago
The wisdom which knows what are and are not dangers is opposed to the ignorance of them
0
⚖0
▼ Source
360d, Benjamin Jowett, trans. | Sometimes misattributed as "Courage is knowing what to fear and what not to fear", this paraphrase is actually from Werner Jaeger's book Paideia: the Ideal of Greek Culture, Volume II, [https://books.google.com/books?id=pAU
6 months 2 weeks ago
I foresee the day when we shall read nothing but telegrams and prayers.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
Thomas Hobbes was the first sociobiologist, two hundred years before Darwin.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, p. 453
6 months 2 weeks ago
Nature admits no lie.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Latter Day Pamphlet, No. 5.
6 months 2 weeks ago

One might naively suppose that a negative utilitarian would welcome human extinction. But only (trans)humans - or our potential superintelligent successors - are technically capable of phasing out the cruelties of the rest of the living world on Earth. And only (trans)humans - or rather our potential superintelligent successors - are technically capable of assuming stewardship of our entire Hubble volume.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
"[https://www.hedweb.com/social-media/pre2014.html Unsorted Postings]", Facebook, pre-2014
6 months 2 weeks ago
If we consider further the manifold relations of this mathematical theory to civil uses and the technical arts, we shall recognize completely the extent of its applications. It is evident that it includes an entire series of distinct phenomena, and that the study of it cannot be omitted without losing a notable part of the science of nature. The principles of the theory are derived, as are those of rational mechanics, from a very small number of primary facts, the causes of which are not considered by geometers, but which they admit as the results of common observations confirmed by all experiment.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Ch. 1, p. 6
6 months 2 weeks ago
My love, Alcibiades, which I hardly like to confess, would long ago have passed away, as I flatter myself, if I saw you loving your good things, or thinking that you ought to pass life in the enjoyment of them.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Socrates speaking to Alcibiades
6 months 2 weeks ago
Creation is in fact a fault, man's famous sin thereby appearing as a minor version of a much graver one. What are we guilty of, except of having followed, more or less slavishly, the Creator's example? Easy to recognize in ourselves the fatality which was His: not for nothing have we issued from the hands of a wicked and woebegone god, a god accursed.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
If Governments neglect to invite what noble intellect there is, then too surely all intellect, not omnipotent to resist bad influences, will tend to become beaverish ignoble intellect; and quitting high aims, which seem shut up from it, will help itself forward in the way of making money and such like; or will even sink to be sham intellect, helping itself by methods which are not only beaverish but vulpine, and so "ignoble" as not to have common honesty.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago

No amount of happiness enjoyed by some organisms can notionally justify the indescribable horrors of Auschwitz. Nor can the fun and games outweigh the sporadic frightfulness of pain and despair that occurs every second of every day. For there's nothing inherently wrong with non-sentience or non-existence; whereas there is something frightfully and self-intimatingly wrong with suffering.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
2.7 [https://www.hedweb.com/hedethic/hedon2.htm#negative Why Be Negative?]
6 months 2 weeks ago
Man derives two capital advantages from the superiority of his intellectual powers. The first is, that, as an individual, he possesses a certain comprehension of mind, whereby he contemplates and enjoys the past and the future, as well as the present. This comprehension is enlarged with the experience of every day; and by this means the happiness of man, as he advances in intellect, is continually less dependent on temporary circumstances and sensations.The next advantage resulting from the same principle, and which is, in many respects, both the cause and effect of the former, is, that the human species itself is capable of a similar and unbounded improvement; whereby mankind in a later age are greatly superior to mankind in a former age, the individuals being taken at the same time of life.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Section I, "Of the First Principles of Government, and the different kinds of Liberty"
6 months 2 weeks ago
Every right of suffrage, like any political right in general, is not to be measured by some sort of abstract scheme of “justice,” or in terms of any other bourgeois-democratic phrases, but by the social and economic relationships for which it is designed. The right of suffrage worked out by the Soviet government is calculated for the transition period from the bourgeois-capitalist to the socialist form of society, that is, it is calculated for the period of the proletarian dictatorship. But, according to the interpretation of this dictatorship which Lenin and Trotsky represent, the right to vote is granted only to those who live by their own labor and is denied to everyone else.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Chapter Five, "The Question of Suffrage"
6 months 2 weeks ago
Skepticism is an exercise in defascination.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago

The most remarkable piece of reading that you may be recommended to take and try if you can study is a book by Goethe—one of his last books, which he wrote when he was an old man, about seventy years of age—I think one of the most beautiful he ever wrote, full of mild wisdom, and which is found to be very touching by those who have eyes to discern and hearts to feel it. It is one of the pieces in "Wilhelm Meister's Travels." I read it through many years ago; and, of course, I had to read into it very hard when I was translating it (applause), and it has always dwelt in my mind as about the most remarkable bit of writing that I have known to be executed in these late centuries. I have often said, there are ten pages of that which, if ambition had been my only rule, I would rather have written than have written all the books that have appeared since I came into the world.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
What I would like to show is that there is a vital dimension of their writing, which I call performative reflexivity, which if ignored or misunderstood will impede an adequate response to it.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Chapter 8, Performative Reflexivity, p. 134
6 months 2 weeks ago
If A were not allowed his better position, B would be even worse off than he is.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Chapter II, Section 17, pg. 103
6 months 2 weeks ago
Few men have had to struggle for so many years with circumstances more straitened and precarious than my father; few men have ventured to attack so many or such inveterate prejudices respecting the prevalent religion of his country, or have advanced bolder or more important opinions in opposition to the courtly politics of the powers that be; few have had to encounter more able opponents in his literary career, or have been exposed to such incessant and vindictive obloquy, from men of every description, in return for his unremitting exertions in the cause of truth; yet none have more uniformly proceeded with a single eye, regardless of consequences, to act as his conviction impelled him, and his conscience dictated. His conduct brought with it its own reward, reputation, and respect, from the most eminent of his contemporaries, the affectionate attachment of most valuable friends, and a cheerfulness of disposition arising in part from conscious rectitude which no misfortunes could long repress. But to me it seems, that conscious rectitude alone would hardly of itself have been able to support him under some of the afflictions he was doomed to bear. He had a farther resource, to him never failing and invaluable, a firm persuasion of the benevolence of the Almighty towards all his creatures, and the conviction that every part of his own life, like every part of the whole system, was preordained for the best upon the whole of existence. Had he entertained the gloomy notions of Calvinism, in which he was brought up, this cheering source of contentment and resignation would probably have failed him, and irritation and despondency would have gained an unhappy ascendancy. But by him the deity was not regarded as an avenging tyrant, punishing, for the sake of punishing his weak and imperfect creatures, but as a wise and kind parent, inflicting those corrections only that are necessary to bring our dispositions to the proper temper, and to fit us for the highest state of happiness of which our natures are ultimately capable.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
His son, Joseph Priestley, in the Preface (1 May 1805) to Memoirs of the Rev. Dr. Joseph Priestly (1809), p. 41.
6 months 2 weeks ago

We laugh, but inept is our laughter; We should weep and weep sore, Who are shattered like glass, and thereafter Re-moulded no more!

0
⚖0
▼ Source
As quoted in Three Great Abbasid Poets: Abu Nuwas, Al-Mutanabbi & Al-Ma'arri, Lives & Poems (2015) by Paul Smith
6 months 2 weeks ago
Change alone is eternal, perpetual, immortal.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Unverified attribution noted in Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations (1993), ed. Suzy Platt, Library of Congress, p. 39; compare Heraclitus: Nothing endures but change.
6 months 2 weeks ago
Not one moment when I have not been conscious of being outside Paradise.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
After fifty years we are still dependent on him for Cromwell, and in Past and Present he gave what was the most remarkable piece of historical thinking in the language. But the mystery of investigation had not been revealed to him when he began his most famous book [The French Revolution] ... [T]he vivid gleam, the mixture of the sublime with the grotesque, make other opponents forget the impatient verdicts and the poverty of settled fact in the volumes that delivered our fathers from thraldom to Burke. They remain one of those disappointing storm-clouds that give out more thunder than lightning.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Lord Acton, ‘Appendix: The Literature of the Revolution’ (c. 1895–99), quoted in Lord Acton, Lectures on the French Revolution, eds. J. N. Figgis and R. V. Laurence (1910), pp. 358–359
6 months 2 weeks ago
For it is the same thing that can be thought and that can be.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Frag. B 3, quoted by Plotinus, Enneads V, i.8
6 months 2 weeks ago
Being happy involves both a certain achievement in action and a rational assurance about the outcome.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Chapter IX, Section 83, p. 549
6 months 2 weeks ago
Knowing is what counts. To know one's country and govern it with that knowledge is the only way to free it from tyranny.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
I am surprised to see that today everything that does not amount to surrender pure and simple to generalized capitalism, let us call it thus, is considered to be archaic or old-fashioned, as though in a way there existed no other definition of what it means to be modern than, quite simply, to be at all times caught in the dominant forms of the moment.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
From Can Change Be Thought? A Dialogue with Alain Badiou by Bruno Bosteels, in Alain Badiou: Philosophy And Its Conditions, edited by Gabriel Riera. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005. .
6 months 2 weeks ago
Thus, because Christian morals leave animals out of consideration … therefore in philosophical morals they are of course at once outlawed; they are merely "things," simply means to ends of any sort; and so they are good for vivisection, for deer-stalking, bull-fights, horse-races, etc., and they may be whipped to death as they struggle along with heavy quarry carts. Shame on such a morality … which fails to recognize the Eternal Reality immanent in everything that has life, and shining forth with inscrutable significance from all eyes that see the sun!
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Part II, Ch. VI, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/94/mode/2up pp. 94]-95
6 months 2 weeks ago
All my life, I have lived with the feeling that I have been kept from my true place. If the expression "metaphysical exile" had no meaning, my existence alone would afford it one.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
If you want one great name in English literature that sums up all that England does not stand for, a bitter spirit, sour, an extravagant, a worshipper of force and of the führerprinzip, it can be said in one name: Carlyle.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
A. L. Rowse, 'The English Spirit', The English Spirit: Essays in History and Literature (1944), p. 37
6 months 2 weeks ago
The happiness which belongs to man, is that state in which he enjoys as many of the good things, and suffers as few of the evils incident to human nature as possible; passing his days in a smooth course of permanent tranquility. A wise man, though deprived of sight or hearing, may experience happiness in the enjoyment of the good things which yet remain; and when suffering torture, or laboring under some painful disease, can mitigate the anguish by patience, and can enjoy, in his afflictions, the consciousness of his own constancy.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
Parmenides does not say a word about "Being" anywhere. The assertion that it is...amounts to ...the universe is a plenum; and ...there is no ...empty space ...From this it follows that there can be no such thing as motion. Instead of endowing the One with an impulse to change, as Herakleitos... Parmenides dismissed change as an illusion. He showed... if you take the One seriously you are bound to deny everything else. All previous solutions... had missed the point.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
Fortunately, there is a sane equilibrium in the character of nations, as there is in that of men. The force of passion is balanced by the force of interest. An insatiable appetite for glory leads to sacrifice and death, but innate instinct leads to self-preservation and life. A nation that neglects either of these forces perishes. They must be steered together, like a pair of carriage horses.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
Modernity is one of the most delicate and vital issues confronting us, the people of non-European countries and Islamic societies. A more important issue is the relationship between an imposed modernization and genuine civilization. We must discover if modernity as is claimed is a synonym for being civilised, or if it is an altogether different issue and social phenomenon having no relation to civilisation at all. Unfortunately modernity has been imposed on us, the non-European nations, in the guise of civilization.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
p. 17: Second paragraph.
6 months 2 weeks ago
Our moral virtues benefit mainly other people; intellectual virtues, on the other hand, benefit primarily ourselves; therefore the former make us universally popular, the latter unpopular.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
I do nothing, granted. But I see the hours pass — which is better than trying to fill them.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
What in all the world has courage to do with hope?
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Quoted by Harry Slochower in "Julius Bahnsen, Philosopher of Heroic Despair, 1830-1881" (1932), The Philosophical Review, 41(4), p. 381
6 months 2 weeks ago

The infinite is in capacity. That, however, which is infinite in capacity is not to be assumed as that which is infinite in energy. ...It has its being in capacity, and in division and diminution. ...It is always possible to assume something beyond it. It does not, however, on this account surpass every definite magnitude; as in division it surpasses every definite magnitude, and will be less.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
Book III, Ch. VIII, pp. 164-166.
6 months 2 weeks ago
Repression is the response of an increasingly desperate imperialist ruling clique to contain an otherwise uncontrollable and growing popular disaffection leading ultimately, we think, to the revolutionary transformation of society.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
In our monogamous part of the world, to marry means to halve one’s rights and double one’s duties.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Vol. 2, Ch. 27, § 370 | Variant translation: To marry is to halve your rights and double your duties.
6 months 2 weeks ago
To be is to be cornered.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
6 months 2 weeks ago
The man who esteems himself as he ought, and no more than he ought, seldom fails to obtain from other people all the esteem that he himself thinks due. He desires no more than is due to him, and he rests upon it with complete satisfaction.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Section III.
6 months 2 weeks ago
It is vain to expect virtue from women till they are in some degree independent of men; nay, it is vain to expect that strength of natural affection which would make them good wives and mothers. Whilst they are absolutely dependent on their husbands they will be cunning, mean, and selfish.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Ch. 9
6 months 2 weeks ago
Hobbes’s understanding of the dangers of anarchy resonates powerfully today. Liberal thinkers still see the unchecked power of the state as the chief danger to human freedom. Hobbes knew better: freedom’s worst enemy is anarchy, which is at its most destructive when it is a battleground of rival faiths. The sectarian death squads roaming Baghdad show that fundamentalism is itself a type of anarchy in which each prophet claims divine authority to rule. In well-governed societies, the power of faith is curbed. The state and the churches temper the claims of revelation and enforce peace. Where this kind is impossible, tyranny is better than being ruled by warring prophets. Hobbes is a more reliable guide to the present than the liberal thinkers who followed. Yet his view of human beings was too simple, and overly rationalistic. Assuming that humans dread violent death more than anything, he left out the most intractable sources of conflict. It is not always because human beings act irrationally that they fail to achieve peace. Sometimes it is because they do not want peace. They may want the victory of the One True Faith – whether a traditional religion or a secular successor such as communism, democracy or universal human rights. Or – like the young people who joined far-Left terrorist groups in the 1970s, another generation of which is now joining Islamist networks – they may find in war a purpose that is lacking in peace. Nothing is more human than the readiness to kill and die in order to secure a meaning in life.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
Post-Apocalypse: After Secularism (pp. 262-3)
6 months 2 weeks ago
If we are uncritical we shall always find what we want: we shall look for, and find, confirmations, and we shall look away from, and not see, whatever might be dangerous to our pet theories. In this way it is only too easy to obtain what appears to be overwhelming evidence in favor of a theory which, if approached critically, would have been refuted.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
The Poverty of Historicism (1957) Ch. 29 The Unity of Method
6 months 2 weeks ago
The Anarchists are right in everything; in the negation of the existing order, and in the assertion that, without authority, there could not be worse violence than that of authority under existing conditions. They are mistaken only in thinking that Anarchy can be instituted by a revolution. "To establish Anarchy." "Anarchy will be instituted." But it will be instituted only by there being more and more people who do not require protection from governmental power, and by there being more and more people who will be ashamed of applying this power.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
"On Anarchy", in Pamphlets : Translated from the Russian (1900) as translated by Aylmer Maude, p. 22

CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia