Skip to main content
↑ Back to the start
5 months 4 weeks ago
Form displays the relation [to beings] itself as the state of original comportment toward beings, the festive state in which the being itself in its essence is celebrated and thus for the first time placed in the open.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 119
5 months 4 weeks ago
Enjoyment of the work consists in participation in the creative state of the artist.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 117
5 months 4 weeks ago
We do not “have” a body; rather, we “are” bodily.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 99
5 months 4 weeks ago
The relation of feeling toward art and its bringing-forth can be one of production or one of reception and enjoyment.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 78
5 months 4 weeks ago
This is precisely what is decisive in Nietzsche’s conception of art, that he sees it in its essential entirety in terms of the artist; this he does consciously and in explicit opposition to that conception of art which represents it in terms of those who “enjoy” and “experience” it.That is a guiding principle of Nietzsche’s teaching on art: art must be grasped in terms of creators and producers, not recipients. Nietzsche expresses it unequivocally in the following words (WM, 811): “Our aesthetics heretofore has been a woman’s aesthetics, inasmuch as only the recipients of art have formulated their experiences of ‘what is beautiful.’ In all philosophy to date the artist is missing.” Philosophy of art means “aesthetics” for Nietzsche too—but masculine aesthetics, not feminine aesthetics. The question of art is the question of the artist as the productive, creative one; his experiences of what is beautiful must provide the standard.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 70
5 months 4 weeks ago
The small are always dependent on the great; they are “small” precisely because they think they are independent. The great thinker is one who can hear what is greatest in the work of other “greats” and who can transform it in an original manner.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 35
5 months 4 weeks ago
If beings are grasped as will to power, the “should” which is supposed to hang suspended over them, against which they might be measured, becomes superfluous. If life itself is will to power, it is itself the ground, principium, of valuation. Then a “should” does not determine being. Being determines a “should.” “When we talk of values we are speaking under the inspiration or optics of life: life itself compels us to set up values; life itself values through us whenever we posit values.” (VIII, 89)
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 32
5 months 4 weeks ago
In contrast to “Blessed are they who do not see and still believe,” he speaks of “seeing and still not believing.”
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 30
5 months 4 weeks ago
The critique of the highest values hitherto does not simply refute them or declare them invalid. It is rather a matter of displaying their origins as impositions which must affirm precisely what ought to be negated by the values established.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 26
5 months 4 weeks ago
Eternity, not as a static “now,” nor as a sequence of “nows” rolling off into the infinite, but as the “now” that bends back into itself. … Thinking the most difficult thought of philosophy means thinking being as time.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
p. 20

CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia