With regard to the abuse of authority, this also may come about in two ways. First, when what is ordered by an authority is opposed to the object for which that authority was constituted (if, for example, some sinful action is commanded or one which is contrary to virtue, when it is precisely for the protection and fostering of virtue that authority is instituted). In such a case, not only is there no obligation to obey the authority, but one is obliged to disobey it, as did the holy martyrs who suffered death rather than obey the impious commands of tyrants. Secondly, when those who bear such authority command things which exceed the competence of such authority; as, for example, when a master demands payment from a servant which the latter is not bound to make, and other similar cases. In this instance the subject is free to obey or disobey.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
in Aquinas: Selected Political Writings (Basil Blackwell: 1974), p. 183
The order of authority derives from God, as the Apostle says [in Romans 13:1-7]. For this reason, the duty of obedience is, for the Christian, a consequence of this derivation of authority from God, and ceases when that ceases. But, as we have already said, authority may fail to derive from God for two reasons: either because of the way in which authority has been obtained, or in consequence of the use which is made of it. There are two ways in which the first may occur. Either because of a defect in the person, if he is unworthy; or because of some defect in the way itself by which power was acquired, if, for example, through violence, or simony or some other illegal method.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
in Aquinas: Selected Political Writings (Basil Blackwell: 1974), p. 183
Omne verum a quocumque dicatur a Spiritu Sancto est.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
All that is true, from anyone it is said, always comes from the Holy Spirit. | [https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/i-doni-spirituali-e-teologici-riforma-AENoMRwC Summa Theologiae, I-II, q. 109, a. 1, ad 1]
If … the motion of the earth were circular, it would be violent and contrary to nature, and could not be eternal, since … nothing violent is eternal.… It follows, therefore, that the earth is not moved with a circular motion.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
Commentaria in libros Aristotelis de caelo et mundo (Commentary on Aristotle's On the Heavens, c. 1272–1273)