
The law of war lets a soldier shoot an enemy asleep in his tent, yet forbids him to shoot the same man a minute later once he has thrown down his rifle and raised his hands. Why should a gesture change everything? Puzzles like that have kept people arguing for more than two thousand years, from Roman priests and a bishop in North Africa to Chinese philosophers who hired themselves out to defend besieged towns, and on to the diplomats now quarreling over weapons that could pick their own targets.
Between those who think morality has nothing to say about war and those who think it says only "never" lies a demanding middle position, the one most governments, armies and courts now claim to follow. Its tests are hard to pass and easy to fake, which is exactly why they are worth knowing well. Once they are familiar, a leader's promise that force is the last resort, or a spokesman's assurance that civilian deaths were regrettable but proportionate, becomes a claim you can take apart and check against the evidence.
CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia