Skip to main content

Beyond religion, science and politics, print changed the texture of everyday life. It shaped the languages people spoke and wrote, the way they thought of themselves as members of a nation, and the ideas, good and bad, that spread among them.

Standard languages

Before print, written languages varied widely from region to region, and spelling followed no fixed rules. Printers needed to sell books to as many readers as possible, so they tended to use forms that would be understood widely. Over time, the choices of printers and translators, such as Caxton's London English and Luther's German Bible, helped create standard written forms of European languages. Dictionaries and grammars followed: Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language appeared in 1755. Spelling slowly stabilized.

The rise of the vernaculars also reduced the dominance of Latin. Scholars kept writing in Latin into the seventeenth century, but more and more books, including scientific ones, appeared in the languages people spoke at home.

Imagined communities

In his influential 1983 book Imagined Communities, the political scientist Benedict Anderson argued that print helped create modern nations. His key idea was print capitalism: printers, seeking large markets, published books and newspapers in standard vernacular languages. Readers who would never meet each other came to feel part of a single community, because they read the same news in the same language at the same time. A nation, Anderson argued, is an imagined community in this sense: its members imagine their connection to millions of strangers. Critics say Anderson underplays older sources of identity, such as religion and dynasty, but his argument shaped the study of nationalism.

Reading and literacy

Print made books cheaper and more common, but literacy rose slowly. Learning to read still required schooling, time and money. In many Protestant regions, the belief that every Christian should read the Bible encouraged schooling. By the eighteenth century, literacy was high in parts of northern Europe and colonial New England, and much lower elsewhere. Literacy was generally higher among men than women, among townspeople than peasants, and among the wealthy than the poor. Reading aloud remained common, so even people who could not read often heard printed texts.

The dark side: witch hunts

Print spread falsehood as well as truth. In 1486 a German churchman named Heinrich Kramer published the Malleus Maleficarum, or “Hammer of Witches,” a guide to identifying, interrogating and prosecuting witches. It went through many editions and spread its ideas across Europe. Printed pamphlets reported sensational witch trials, spreading fear. Between the fifteenth and eighteenth centuries, tens of thousands of people, most of them women, were executed for witchcraft in Europe. Print did not cause the witch hunts, which had many causes, but it helped spread a shared, terrifying picture of witches that justified cruelty.

The Enlightenment

Print also carried the ideas of the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, with its emphasis on reason, criticism of authority and the rights of individuals. The French Encyclopédie, edited by Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert and published from 1751 to 1772, aimed to gather all human knowledge, including practical crafts, and to encourage readers to think for themselves. French authorities banned it in 1759, but publication continued semi-secretly. In America, Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense (1776), arguing for independence from Britain in plain language, sold tens of thousands of copies within months, and helped turn public opinion toward revolution.

Faster presses

Gutenberg's basic method lasted until the nineteenth century, when steam power transformed printing. In 1814 the London Times began using a steam-powered press developed by the German inventor Friedrich Koenig, printing over a thousand sheets an hour. Later rotary presses, cheap paper made from wood pulp and mechanical typesetting made newspapers and books cheap enough for mass audiences. Print became truly mass media.

Worked example: how a rumor spreads

Picture a German village in 1590. A hailstorm destroys the harvest. Trace how print might shape what happens next.

  1. The event. Villagers suffer, and look for an explanation.
  2. The frame. A traveling seller offers a printed pamphlet describing witches in a distant town who confessed to causing storms. Its woodcut shows women brewing a storm in a cauldron.
  3. The accusation. Neighbors recall that an elderly widow quarreled with a farmer before the storm. The pamphlet's picture seems to fit.
  4. The authority. A local official consults a printed manual on witch trials, which recommends interrogation and treats denial as a sign of guilt.
  5. The outcome. The widow, under torture, confesses and names others.

Each step uses printed material to turn misfortune into accusation. The same technology that spread Copernicus and Milton spread fear. Print amplified what people already believed and gave it the authority of a published page. The lesson applies to every medium: a technology that spreads ideas faster does not decide which ideas spread. That depends on the people who make, share and judge them.

Quiz

5 questions · Practice: scored, not saved

1. What was the Malleus Maleficarum?
2. What did the London Times begin using in 1814?
3. What did Benedict Anderson mean by print capitalism?
4. What did Thomas Paine's Common Sense (1776) argue for?
5. What happened to the Encyclopédie in 1759?

CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia