Skip to main content
↑ Back to the start
6 months 2 weeks ago
He believed that liberalism had saved the intellect at the cost of the repudiating the great historical phenomenon of religion.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
"The Thought and Character of William James" (1935), Vol 2, ch. LXIX
6 months 2 weeks ago
This insistence on "having his say upon the universe" is the profoundest motive of William James thinking as well as of his filial gratitude.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
The Thought and Character of William James (1935), vol. 1, ch. VIII
6 months 2 weeks ago
Indeed I am inclined to go so far as to say that the one cause for which one may properly make war is the cause of peace.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
"Non-Resistance and The Present War - A Reply to Mr. Russell," International Journal of Ethics (April 1915), vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 307-316
6 months 2 weeks ago
In reviewing the several levels of life which morality defines, we may observe two types of universal value. The lower values m relation to the higher are indispensable. There is no health without satisfaction, no achievement without health, no rational intercourse without achievement, and no true religion except as the perfecting and completing of a rational society. The higher values, on the other hand, are more universal than the lower in that they surpass these in validity, and are entitled to preference. Thus the lower values are ennobled by the higher, while the higher are given body and meaning by the lower. Satisfaction derives dignity from being controlled by the motive of good-will, while the moral kingdom at large derives its wealth, its pertinence to life, and its incentive, from the great manifold of particular interests which it conserves and fosters.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
[https://books.google.com/books?id=TjdWAAAAMAAJ The Moral Economy] (1909)
That's everything.

Works (Thanks to Project Gutenberg)

CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia