Skip to main content
5 months 3 weeks ago
When asked whether the algorism of quantum mechanics could be considered as somehow mirroring an underlying quantum world, Bohr would answer, "There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract quantum physical description. It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about nature." Bohr felt that every step in the development of physics has strengthened the view that the problem of establishing an unambiguous description of nature has only one solution. He regarded all attempts to replace our elementary concepts or to introduce a new logic to account for the peculiarities of quantum phenomena as not merely unnecessary but also incompatible with our most fundamental conditions, since we are suspended in a unique language.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Aage Petersen, [http://books.google.com/books?id=DgcAAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA36&pg=PA8 "The philosophy of Niels Bohr"] by in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Vol. 19, No. 7 (September 1963); The Genius of Science: A Portrait Gallery (2000) by Abraham Pais, p.
5 months 3 weeks ago
I remember discussions with Bohr which went through many hours till very late at night and ended almost in despair; and when at the end of the discussion I went alone for a walk in the neighbouring park I repeated to myself again and again the question: Can nature possibly be so absurd as it seemed to us in these atomic experiments?
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Werner Heisenberg in Physics and Philosophy (1958)
5 months 3 weeks ago
Not often in life has a human being caused me such joy by his mere presence as you did.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Albert Einstein in a letter to Bohr (1920)
5 months 3 weeks ago
If quantum theory has any philosophical importance at all, it lies in the fact that it demonstrates for a single, sharply defined science the necessity of dual aspects and complementary considerations. Niels Bohr has discussed this question with respect to many applications in physiology, psychology, and philosophy in general.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Max Born in [https://archive.org/stream/naturalphilosoph032159mbp#page/n137/search/sharply Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance (1949) ch. 10, p. 127]
5 months 3 weeks ago
One of the favorite maxims of my father was the distinction between the two sorts of truths, profound truths recognized by the fact that the opposite is also a profound truth, in contrast to trivialities where opposites are obviously absurd.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Hans Henrik Bohr, writing about his father in "My father" in Niels Bohr - His Life and Work As Seen By His Friends and Colleagues (1967), S. Rozental, ed.
5 months 3 weeks ago
Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Often attributed to Bohr online, and in some books like Our Mathematical Universe by Max Tegmark ([https://books.google.com/books?id=k96ODQAAQBAJ&pg=PA157 p. 157]) and The Great Unknown: Seven Journeys to the Frontiers of Science by Marcus du Sautoy ([htt
5 months 3 weeks ago
Of course not ... but I am told it works even if you don't believe in it.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Reply to a visitor to his home in Tisvilde who asked him if he really believed a horseshoe above his door brought him luck, as quoted in Inward Bound : Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World (1986) by Abraham Pais, p. 210 | In most published accounts
5 months 3 weeks ago
Stop telling God what to do with his dice.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
A response to Einstein's assertion that "God doesn't play dice"; a similar statement is attributed to Enrico Fermi | Variant: Einstein, don't tell God what to do. | Variant: Don't tell God what to do with his dice. | Variant: You ought not to speak for wh
5 months 3 weeks ago
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
As quoted in Teaching and Learning Elementary Social Studies (1970) by Arthur K. Ellis, [https://books.google.com/books?id=87iRaPyukx8C&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22prediction+is+very+difficult%22 p. 431] | The above quote is also attributed to various h
5 months 3 weeks ago
Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.
0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Werner Heisenberg recounts a personal conversation he had with Pauli and Bohr in 1952 in which Bohr says, "Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it." Heisenberg, Werner, Physics and Beyond. (N

CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia