Skip to main content
↑ Back to the start
8 months 1 week ago

They are in you and me; they created us, body and mind; and their preservation is the ultimate rationale for our existence. They have come a long way, those replicators. Now they go by the name of genes, and we are their survival machines.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 2. The replicators
8 months 1 week ago

Darwin's 'survival of the fittest' is really a special case of a more general law of survival of the stable. The universe is populated by stable things. The universe is populated by stable things. A stable thing is a collection of atoms that is permanent enough or common enough to deserve a name. It may be a unique collection of atoms, such as the Matterhorn, that lasts long enough to be worth naming. Or it may be a class of entities, such as rain drops, that come into existence at a sufficiently high rate to deserve a collective name, even if any one of them is short-lived.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 2. The replicators
8 months 1 week ago

The individual selectionist would admit that groups do indeed die out, and that whether or not a group goes extinct may be influenced by the behaviour of the individuals in that group. He might even admit that if only the individuals in a group had the gift of foresight they could see that in the long run their own best interests lay in restraining their selfish greed, to prevent the destruction of the whole group. How many times must this have been said in recent years to the working people of Britain? But group extinction is a slow process compared with the rapid cut and thrust of individual competition. Even while the group is going slowly and inexorably downhill, selfish individuals prosper in the short term at the expense of altruists. The citizens of Britain may or may not be blessed with foresight, but evolution is blind to the future.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 1. Why Are People?
8 months 1 week ago

Let us try to teach generosity and altruism, because we are born selfish. Let us understand what our own selfish genes are up to, because we may then at least have a chance to upset their designs, something that no other species has ever aspired to do.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 1. Why Are People?
8 months 1 week ago

I am not advocating a morality based on evolution. I am saying how things have evolved. I am not saying how we humans morally ought to behave.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 1. Why Are People?
8 months 1 week ago

The argument of this book is that we, and all other animals, are machines created by our genes.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 1. Why Are People?
8 months 1 week ago

Today the theory of evolution is about as much open to doubt as the theory that the earth goes round the sun, but the full implications of Darwin's revolution have yet to be widely realized.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 1. Why Are People?
8 months 1 week ago

We no longer have to resort to superstition when faced with the deep problems: Is there a meaning to life? What are we for? What is man?

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 1. Why Are People?
8 months 1 week ago

Living organisms had existed on earth, without ever knowing why, for over three thousand million years before the truth finally dawned on one of them. His name was Charles Darwin. To be fair, others had had inklings of the truth, but it was Darwin who first put together a coherent and tenable account of why we exist.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Ch. 1. Why Are People?
8 months 1 week ago

We are survival machines-robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes. This is a truth which still fills me with astonishment.

0
⚖0
▼ Source
source
Preface to the first edition

CivilSimian.com created by AxiomaticPanic, CivilSimian, Kalokagathia