Anybody can become angry, that is easy, but to be angry with the right person, and to the right degree, and at the right time, and for the right purpose, and in the right way, that is not within everybody's power and it is not easy.

I think we all understand why this image is absurd. Whether modern Christians want to believe it or not, Jesus was liberal minded. He taught a message of universality and aversion to greed. That being said, it's really hard to know exactly what has been added into the Christian bible as a matter of political council and what has truly been said by the characters.

So, this is something Dems have to do. They know how the system operates when it effectively serves the people at large, the greater good, so, they only go low when forced to. Nobody can change the fact that it's a reaction. It's not an affirmation.

This is a philosophically perfect, well-structured letter, that covers all the necessary background ethics. Not a single bit of excess, or a single concept missing in making the point. It affirms the reactive state of the decision and explains the ideal situation based on precedent and functional universal ideology.

Not taking actions like this is tantamount to just giving a free pass to the current administration to do whatever they want. It's become our duty to do unethical things, in reaction, to block the effects of the unethical moves of the other. This is truly Machiavellian (not the distorted modern view), doing something that may appear unethical, but serves the greater good.

The current "strong man" administration are nothing more than cheaters and liars pretending to keep it legal to avoid consequence. We have to produce consequence wherever we can.